After a good run of more than a week of clear nights in early April, the rest of the month brought rather poor weather, only a couple of nights in the month were were completely cloud free.
Two NEOs (both discovered during April with telescopes of the Catalina Sky Survey) came closer to Earth than the Moon, 2008 GM2 was discovered three days after its close pass, so had already receded to about 2.7 Lunar Distances (L.D.) before being picked up. I recorded it about 14 hours after discovery at about 3.3 L.D. but already it had slowed to a very sedate apparent speed of 6"/min.
The other was 2008 GF1, discovered on April 5th just over two days before closest approach and last caught from Great Shefford just before midnight, late on April 6th when it was moving at 70"/min and at mag +17.6, just over 2 L.D. away, about 12 hours before passing Earth at 0.8 L.D. Unfortunately, it was not picked up again, favourable locations for observing the fly-by being in central Asia, so both these NEOs went unobserved when at their closest.
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
2008 March notes: 2008 EZ7
Observing was limited in March, a combination of poor weather with very few nights keeping clear throughout and also the telescope being out of operation for a week, the problems eventually being tracked down to a failing mains transformer (see investigation in progress).
On 7th March (four days before the telescope broke down!) the Apollo 2008 EZ7 was discovered from the Siding Spring Observatory in Australia. From its accelerating motion it was obviously already very close to Earth and it was put on the NEO Confirmation page later that day. With a rapidly expanding uncertainty area where the new fast moving object was predicted to be I was fortunate enough to be able to confirm it later that evening at magnitude +17, at an altitude of less than 13 degrees, shortly before it disappeared into trees.
The next night it was to pass only 0.419 Lunar Distances (100,000 miles) from Earth, closest approach being at 01:21UT on 9th March. The first half of the night was cloudly but with breaks expected later in the morning. I started to try for it through gaps in the clouds at 01:47UT at which time it was moving at over 630"/minute. On the first low resolution shot taken to position the telescope, there it was, very obvious as a strong 30" long streak in the 3 second exposure. However, for the next half an hour the clouds stopped me getting anything other than more positioning shots, but eventually it was recorded in a 30 second gap in the clouds, enough to get eight 1 second exposures off. At that point it was magnitude +13, moving at 623"/minute and only about 102,000 miles from Earth.
The eight (rather noisy) images have been combined here with 2007 EZ7 moving from right to left. The field of view is 18'x18' and there is a 2 second gap between each of the exposures.
A few minutes later, when repositioning the telescope for the next attempt I recorded 2007 EZ7 streaking along as before, but also with another very similar streak in the field of view. This turned out to be artifical satellite 1985-048C=15825U, moving at about 900"/minute and more than four times closer than the NEO. I wonder how many NEOs on very close approaches are assumed to be artificial satellites in CCD images?
2007 EZ7 is to the right and 1985-048C is the slightly longer streak to the left below.
At the time of writing there have only been two other NEOs (with well determined orbits) that have been observed closer to Earth than 2007 EZ7, those being 2004 FH and 2006 DD1, but no doubt, with the pace of NEO discoveries at the moment, it is only a matter of time before another is seen to fly past even closer. Just three weeks later 2008 FP came closer than the Moon and was observed by the Catalina Sky Survey only slightly further out than 2007 EZ7, at a distance of 106,000 miles.
On 7th March (four days before the telescope broke down!) the Apollo 2008 EZ7 was discovered from the Siding Spring Observatory in Australia. From its accelerating motion it was obviously already very close to Earth and it was put on the NEO Confirmation page later that day. With a rapidly expanding uncertainty area where the new fast moving object was predicted to be I was fortunate enough to be able to confirm it later that evening at magnitude +17, at an altitude of less than 13 degrees, shortly before it disappeared into trees.
The next night it was to pass only 0.419 Lunar Distances (100,000 miles) from Earth, closest approach being at 01:21UT on 9th March. The first half of the night was cloudly but with breaks expected later in the morning. I started to try for it through gaps in the clouds at 01:47UT at which time it was moving at over 630"/minute. On the first low resolution shot taken to position the telescope, there it was, very obvious as a strong 30" long streak in the 3 second exposure. However, for the next half an hour the clouds stopped me getting anything other than more positioning shots, but eventually it was recorded in a 30 second gap in the clouds, enough to get eight 1 second exposures off. At that point it was magnitude +13, moving at 623"/minute and only about 102,000 miles from Earth.
The eight (rather noisy) images have been combined here with 2007 EZ7 moving from right to left. The field of view is 18'x18' and there is a 2 second gap between each of the exposures.
A few minutes later, when repositioning the telescope for the next attempt I recorded 2007 EZ7 streaking along as before, but also with another very similar streak in the field of view. This turned out to be artifical satellite 1985-048C=15825U, moving at about 900"/minute and more than four times closer than the NEO. I wonder how many NEOs on very close approaches are assumed to be artificial satellites in CCD images?
2007 EZ7 is to the right and 1985-048C is the slightly longer streak to the left below.
Monday, 4 February 2008
2008 January notes: 2005 BT1, BI10604, 2007 XS16, 2008 AV72 = 2000 JF4 = 2006 PH11
January was rather disappointing with fewer hours logged observing than for the same month in any of the previous 5 years.
A highlight was the recovery of the Apollo 2005 BT1, originally discovered by LINEAR on 16 Jan 2005 and followed for 47 days. Predicted to have a favourable approach in Jan 2008, a search was started from Great Shefford on Jan 24th, the expected magnitude given by the Minor Planet Center was +19.1 and the likely uncertainty area given as over 8 degrees long, aligned almost North-South.
I covered the central 4 degrees with my 18'x18' field of view during 24/25 Jan and extended this to the N by another degree on 26 Jan but searching was cut short by clouds. Only 0.5 degrees was added to the S the next night before clouds interrupted again, but finally on 28 Jan, on the first attempted field that night the NEO was finally caught, 2.35 degrees off track to the south. It had taken 814 images taken on the four nights, of 30 separate fields to locate it.
The next night was cloudy again in the UK so I contacted Sergio Foglia (IAU code 147) and Luca Buzzi (code 204) in Italy to see if either of them had good skies to try and get a confirming second night of positions for it. Sergio was not able to observe but Luca managed to get some astrometry before he too was clouded out. With the positions from 2008 Sergio then searched for possible images from the old SkyMorph image archives and managed to locate it faintly on two images from 07 Jan 2002 taken with the Palomar 1.2-m Schmidt. All three sets of positions were sent off to the MPC and within the hour MPEC 2008-B60 was issued formally announcing the recovery.
Another extensive search that didn't end up with such a positive result was also a LINEAR discovery found at 03h UT on 16 Jan and posted on the NEO Confirmation page with temporary designation BI10604 just after midnight on 17 Jan. Although relatively bright at mag +17, by the time I could observe on the evening of 17 Jan the uncertainty area was a 1 deg x 2.5 deg oval. I covered the whole area with multiple images being taken of 31 different fields, but did not find it. By the end of the 4 hour session the area had already expanded by a further 0.5 degrees. It never did get recovered by any observatory and two nights later was removed from the NEOCP...
A good set of luck came my way on 7th Jan while I was following up on one of the main belt discoveries I had made in December (2007 XS16). I found a very faint moving object, about mag +21, that did not match any known object and so measured positions of it. I had hoped to try for it again in the coming nights and send in two nights of astrometry to the Minor Planet Center, but clouds stopped any further attempt for over a week. By 17th Jan I decided to just send in the positions as a one night stand (ONS), expecting that I would not hear any more about it. However, by the next day the MPC had managed to match it up to a ONS from the 1.5-m reflector of the Mt Lemmon Survey obtained 5 days after mine on 12 Jan. It was designated as 2008 AV72 and I was given discovery credit for having the earlier of the two ONS!
With this extra data I now realised that other images taken of 2007 XS16 from the previous month might include 2008 AV72 and on re-examining these managed to find it on images taken 29 Dec and then 19 Dec 2007. After these pre-discovery positions were sent in, the MPC quickly managed to find various other ONS back to May 2000 and even two occasions where the object had been given a designation on the basis of two nights of observations (not enough to determine a proper orbit), these being 2000 JF4 and 2006 PH11. Because 2008 AV72 had a 2 month observed arc in 2007/8 it was retained as the primary designation and with observations at 5 oppositions and an MPC uncertainty code of 1 it is now in a state where it could potentially get numbered - not bad for just sending in the ONS from 07 Jan having lost hope of being able to find it again!
A highlight was the recovery of the Apollo 2005 BT1, originally discovered by LINEAR on 16 Jan 2005 and followed for 47 days. Predicted to have a favourable approach in Jan 2008, a search was started from Great Shefford on Jan 24th, the expected magnitude given by the Minor Planet Center was +19.1 and the likely uncertainty area given as over 8 degrees long, aligned almost North-South.
I covered the central 4 degrees with my 18'x18' field of view during 24/25 Jan and extended this to the N by another degree on 26 Jan but searching was cut short by clouds. Only 0.5 degrees was added to the S the next night before clouds interrupted again, but finally on 28 Jan, on the first attempted field that night the NEO was finally caught, 2.35 degrees off track to the south. It had taken 814 images taken on the four nights, of 30 separate fields to locate it.
The next night was cloudy again in the UK so I contacted Sergio Foglia (IAU code 147) and Luca Buzzi (code 204) in Italy to see if either of them had good skies to try and get a confirming second night of positions for it. Sergio was not able to observe but Luca managed to get some astrometry before he too was clouded out. With the positions from 2008 Sergio then searched for possible images from the old SkyMorph image archives and managed to locate it faintly on two images from 07 Jan 2002 taken with the Palomar 1.2-m Schmidt. All three sets of positions were sent off to the MPC and within the hour MPEC 2008-B60 was issued formally announcing the recovery.
Another extensive search that didn't end up with such a positive result was also a LINEAR discovery found at 03h UT on 16 Jan and posted on the NEO Confirmation page with temporary designation BI10604 just after midnight on 17 Jan. Although relatively bright at mag +17, by the time I could observe on the evening of 17 Jan the uncertainty area was a 1 deg x 2.5 deg oval. I covered the whole area with multiple images being taken of 31 different fields, but did not find it. By the end of the 4 hour session the area had already expanded by a further 0.5 degrees. It never did get recovered by any observatory and two nights later was removed from the NEOCP...
A good set of luck came my way on 7th Jan while I was following up on one of the main belt discoveries I had made in December (2007 XS16). I found a very faint moving object, about mag +21, that did not match any known object and so measured positions of it. I had hoped to try for it again in the coming nights and send in two nights of astrometry to the Minor Planet Center, but clouds stopped any further attempt for over a week. By 17th Jan I decided to just send in the positions as a one night stand (ONS), expecting that I would not hear any more about it. However, by the next day the MPC had managed to match it up to a ONS from the 1.5-m reflector of the Mt Lemmon Survey obtained 5 days after mine on 12 Jan. It was designated as 2008 AV72 and I was given discovery credit for having the earlier of the two ONS!
With this extra data I now realised that other images taken of 2007 XS16 from the previous month might include 2008 AV72 and on re-examining these managed to find it on images taken 29 Dec and then 19 Dec 2007. After these pre-discovery positions were sent in, the MPC quickly managed to find various other ONS back to May 2000 and even two occasions where the object had been given a designation on the basis of two nights of observations (not enough to determine a proper orbit), these being 2000 JF4 and 2006 PH11. Because 2008 AV72 had a 2 month observed arc in 2007/8 it was retained as the primary designation and with observations at 5 oppositions and an MPC uncertainty code of 1 it is now in a state where it could potentially get numbered - not bad for just sending in the ONS from 07 Jan having lost hope of being able to find it again!
Sunday, 6 January 2008
2007 December notes: Observing statistics, 2007 XZ9
2007 ended up with some surprising statistics for Great Shefford. Even though we suffered the very bad run of summer weather from May through August I ended up with about 5% more nights used than in 2006, about 5% more time exposing the CCD (22 days 3hours in total) and about 14% more images taken than in the previous year.
The Catalina NEO Survey was snowed out for some of the month, though for the remaining time there were still some fairly busy periods, with several occasions when there were 20, 30 or more newly discovered objects needing follow-up on the NEO Confirmation page. More than 50 new NEOs were eventually added by the surveys to the overall tally by month end, despite the weather.
One consequence of the surveys being out of action for days at a time was a good crop of main belt minor planets available for discovery by amateurs. I picked up 12, my highest monthly total and other amateurs were also very successful too. Most of the NEOs observed here were only picked up for one or two nights, with 2007 XZ9 (an Apollo discovered by LINEAR) being observed the longest, but that only for 6 days.
The Catalina NEO Survey was snowed out for some of the month, though for the remaining time there were still some fairly busy periods, with several occasions when there were 20, 30 or more newly discovered objects needing follow-up on the NEO Confirmation page. More than 50 new NEOs were eventually added by the surveys to the overall tally by month end, despite the weather.
One consequence of the surveys being out of action for days at a time was a good crop of main belt minor planets available for discovery by amateurs. I picked up 12, my highest monthly total and other amateurs were also very successful too. Most of the NEOs observed here were only picked up for one or two nights, with 2007 XZ9 (an Apollo discovered by LINEAR) being observed the longest, but that only for 6 days.
Tuesday, 4 December 2007
2007 November notes: 2007 VA85 and 2007 VW266
The first half of November was reasonable, with at least some clear sky on 11 nights, but just 3 nights in the last half, including the obligatory crystal clear sky from dusk until dawn on the night of the full moon ...
An interesting object found on Nov 4th by LINEAR was 2007 VA85, 18th magnitude and placed at discovery in the early evening sky between Cygnus and Lyra, passing through the Cygnus star cloud during the next week. It was put on the NEO Confirmation Page and left there for nearly 5 days while the Minor Planet Center waited to see if anyone could detect any cometary features. In the end it was announced as a minor planet but with a very unusual retrograde orbit - four months after perihelion at q = 1.1 AU, with inclination = 132 degrees and period just 8.5 years. I followed it through the rich star fields of Cygnus on 5 nights, trying to catch it in enough empty sky to see whether it displayed any cometary features. Finally on 23 Nov I managed to get a total exposure of 41m 40s at a scale of 1.1"/pixel but could not detect any activity at all.
A week after 2007 VA85 was discovered, the Catalina survey's Mt Lemmon telescope picked up 2007 VW266. This was much fainter at mag. 21 and I just managed to catch it on a single night. By coincidence, it too turned out to have a short period retrograde orbit and was left on the NEO Confirmation Page for 7 days but again, no cometary features were detected by any of the seven observatories contributing astrometry. It has inclination = 108 degrees, q = 3.3 and period = 12.2 years.
In the Minor Planet Center MPCORB database there are only 18 minor planets listed with retrograde orbits and of those, 2007 VA85 and 2007 VW266 have the two shortest periods, with 2007 VA85 also having the smallest perihelion distance of the 18. In comparison, the comet with the shortest period retrograde orbit currently known is P/2006 R1 (Siding Spring) with inclination = 160 degrees, q = 1.7 AU and period = 13.3 years.
An interesting object found on Nov 4th by LINEAR was 2007 VA85, 18th magnitude and placed at discovery in the early evening sky between Cygnus and Lyra, passing through the Cygnus star cloud during the next week. It was put on the NEO Confirmation Page and left there for nearly 5 days while the Minor Planet Center waited to see if anyone could detect any cometary features. In the end it was announced as a minor planet but with a very unusual retrograde orbit - four months after perihelion at q = 1.1 AU, with inclination = 132 degrees and period just 8.5 years. I followed it through the rich star fields of Cygnus on 5 nights, trying to catch it in enough empty sky to see whether it displayed any cometary features. Finally on 23 Nov I managed to get a total exposure of 41m 40s at a scale of 1.1"/pixel but could not detect any activity at all.
A week after 2007 VA85 was discovered, the Catalina survey's Mt Lemmon telescope picked up 2007 VW266. This was much fainter at mag. 21 and I just managed to catch it on a single night. By coincidence, it too turned out to have a short period retrograde orbit and was left on the NEO Confirmation Page for 7 days but again, no cometary features were detected by any of the seven observatories contributing astrometry. It has inclination = 108 degrees, q = 3.3 and period = 12.2 years.
In the Minor Planet Center MPCORB database there are only 18 minor planets listed with retrograde orbits and of those, 2007 VA85 and 2007 VW266 have the two shortest periods, with 2007 VA85 also having the smallest perihelion distance of the 18. In comparison, the comet with the shortest period retrograde orbit currently known is P/2006 R1 (Siding Spring) with inclination = 160 degrees, q = 1.7 AU and period = 13.3 years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)